Glycolic Acid Statistics: 48 Products by the Numbers (2026)

Last reviewed: 2026-08-28 · by the glycolicacidcleanser.com editorial team

We independently evaluate products — verifying the ingredient list for every pick, and never accepting paid placement. Amazon links earn us a commission at no cost to you. How we research · Affiliate disclosure →

This page is a compiled, sourced reference for glycolic acid numbers: what concentrations real products actually contain, what regulators allow, and the chemistry constants behind the percentages. The product data comes from our own database of 48 verified glycolic acid products spanning 31 brands — every ingredient list checked by hand. Every catalog-derived figure below is computed directly from that dataset and machine-verified before publication, not estimated. Writers and researchers are welcome to cite any figure here; a ready-to-copy citation is at the bottom of the page.

Key Numbers at a Glance

Concentration by Product Format: The Ladder

The single most useful pattern in the data: format determines concentration. Choosing a cleanser versus a peel pad is effectively choosing a 4× difference in strength. Compiled from the 44 products in our database that disclose concentration:

Format Products (n) Disclosed range Median Contact type
Cleansers 6 1.5% – 10% 4.1% Rinse-off
Body washes 5 2% – 15% 5% Rinse-off
Toners 6 2% – 10% 7% Leave-on
Serums 5 5% – 15% 10% Leave-on
Creams & lotions 9 10% – 20% 12% Leave-on
Peel pads 5 5% – 35% 20% Timed leave-on
At-home peels 7 1% – 70% 30% Timed, rinse-off

Source: GAC product database, August 2026 (n=44 disclosed, of 48 products). Blends counted at their stated glycolic/AHA figure.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70% Cleansers 1.5%–10% (n=6) Body washes 2%–15% (n=5) Toners 2%–10% (n=6) Serums 5%–15% (n=5) Creams & lotions 10%–20% (n=10) Peel pads 5%–35% (n=5) At-home peels 1%–70% (n=7)
Disclosed concentration range by product format (bar), with the format median marked (vertical line). Computed from src/_data/products.json at build time — n=44 disclosed of 48 products. Source: GAC product database, August 2026.

Two patterns worth noting. First, rinse-off formats run gentle (cleanser median 4.1%) because contact time is seconds — which is also why they're the safest entry point. Second, the counterintuitive one: creams run stronger than serums (median 12% vs 10%) — driven by body creams formulated for keratosis pilaris and rough skin, where thicker skin tolerates more acid. For what each tier actually does to your skin, see the percentage guide.

Cleansers

Six of the seven cleanser listings disclose a concentration (1.5% – 10%), and the format median — 4.1%, the lowest of any format in the database — reflects how briefly a rinse-off product sits on skin. The gentlest disclosed cleanser is Botanic Tree Hydrating Glycolic Acid Cleanser (1.5%), a glycolic-salicylic blend built for daily use; the strongest is Serious Skincare Glycolic Cleanser (10%), near the CIR's suggested ceiling for any leave-on-adjacent formula. Contact time, not formulation restraint, is why cleansers can run this wide a spread without the irritation risk a leave-on would carry at the same percentage.

Body washes

Five body washes disclose a concentration, spanning 2% – 15% — well above the cleanser range, because body skin is thicker than facial skin (see the by-body-area breakdown below). The mildest is Mario Badescu AHA Botanical Body Soap (2%); the strongest is TOUCH Keratosis Pilaris Exfoliating Body Wash Cleanser (15%), formulated specifically for KP on arms and legs rather than general daily cleansing. Format median: 5%.

Toners

Six toners disclose a concentration, from 2% – 10%, median 7% — the format most people mean when they say "glycolic toner." Thayers 2% AHA Exfoliating and Brightening Toner (2%) sits at the gentle end; The INKEY List 10% Glycolic Acid Toner (10%) at the strong end. The best-selling single product in the entire database, The Ordinary's 7% toner, lands almost exactly on the format median — which may explain why it's the category's de-facto default (see Marketplace Snapshot below).

Serums

Five serums disclose a concentration, ranging 5% – 15% with a median of 10% — a full leave-on step up from toners. CeraVe Skin Renewing Nightly Exfoliating Treatment 5% AHA (5%) anchors the gentle end as a glycolic-lactic blend; QRxLabs 15% Glycolic Acid Renewal Serum (15%) anchors the strong end.

Creams & lotions

All nine cream and lotion listings disclose a concentration — the highest disclosure rate of any format — ranging 10% – 20% with a median of 12%, higher than serums despite creams generally reading as the "gentler" format on a shelf. Alpha Skin Care Essential Renewal Cream 10% Glycolic AHA (10%) sits at the format floor, tied with two other 10% products; Replenix Glycolic Acid 20% Resurfacing Cream (20%) tops the range, tied with DCL's 20% AHA Resurfacing Lotion. The skew is driven by body-focused creams and lotions formulated for rough skin and keratosis pilaris, where thicker skin tolerates more acid than the face.

Peel pads

Five peel pads disclose a concentration, from 5% – 35%, median 20% — the first format where "peel" language becomes literal rather than marketing. Nip + Fab Glycolic Fix Night Pads Extreme (5%) is a multi-acid blend at the gentle end; NUVADERMIS 35% Glycolic Acid Peel Pads (35%) is the single strongest disclosed pad concentration in the database, above the professional in-clinic peel floor.

At-home peels

At-home peels disclose the widest range of any format, 1% – 70%, with a median of 30% — a 70-fold spread inside a single product category. The gentlest is Era Organics Glycolic Acid Peel AHA BHA Exfoliant (1%), a multi-acid blend where glycolic is a minor component; the strongest is Divine Derriere Glycolic Acid Peel 70% (70%) — a concentration the product's own name states outright, since at that strength the number itself is the selling point. Anything above 20% in this format crosses into chemical-burn-risk territory without professional-style timing and neutralization (see Regulatory & Clinical Numbers below).

Brands, Blends, and Availability

The 48 products span 31 brands — no single manufacturer dominates the catalog. The most-represented brand is Glytone, with 4 of the 48 listings (two cleansers, a body wash, and a body lotion), followed by five brands tied at three listings each: The Ordinary, Mario Badescu, QRxLabs, Replenix, Alpha Skin Care. Beyond that, 21 of the 31 brands appear exactly once — a long tail that reads as a fragmented commodity market rather than a category with an entrenched leader. That fragmentation is itself a useful signal for shoppers: no single brand has earned category-wide default status the way, say, a leading toner brand might in a more consolidated space. The closest thing to a default is a single SKU, not a brand — see the most-reviewed product in the Marketplace Snapshot below.

Formulation is mostly single-ingredient: of the 44 products that disclose a concentration, 36 of 44 use glycolic acid as the sole active exfoliant, while 8 of 44 are multi-acid blends — most commonly paired with salicylic or lactic acid. Blends cluster toward the extremes of each format's range (the gentlest cleanser and the gentlest at-home peel are both blends), which suggests formulators reach for a second acid either to soften a low-glycolic formula or to round out an aggressive one.

3684 Single-ingredient (36) Multi-acid blend (8) Not disclosed (4)
Formulation composition of the 48-product database: single-ingredient glycolic acid formulas, multi-acid blends, and products that don't disclose a concentration at all. Source: GAC product database, August 2026.

Availability skews away from Prime: only 3 of 48 products in the database are Prime-eligible. That tracks with the category — peels, pads, and treatment-grade creams are more often shipped standard than the impulse-buy cleansers and toners retailers stock for fast delivery.

Concentration by Body Area

Skin thickness varies several-fold across the body, and tolerable concentrations vary with it. Compiled from our body & underarm guide and the product data above:

Area Typical range Why
Face (daily use) 2–10% Standard consumer range; CIR ceiling is 10% at pH 3.5+
Underarms 5–7% Thin, folded (intertriginous) skin — more reactive than the face
Bikini line 5–7% Same sensitivity class as underarms; outer area only
Arms & legs (KP) 7–10% Thicker skin; the standard KP treatment range
Elbows & knees 10%+ Thick, friction-hardened skin tolerates more
Feet & heels 10–15% Thickest skin on the body
Scalp No established standard Dedicated glycolic scalp products are rare; most scalp exfoliants use salicylic acid instead. Users who repurpose a glycolic toner typically stay at 5–7%, used cautiously

Cross-reference this against the product-format ladder above and a pattern emerges: the database's body wash range (2% – 15%) already spans nearly the entire underarm-to-heel spread on its own, which is why a single body wash product rarely suits the whole body — the bottle's labeled percentage may be right for elbows and wrong for underarms in the same use. Cleansers (1.5% – 10%) and toners (2% – 10%) map cleanly onto the face row; creams (10% – 20%) and peel pads (5% – 35%) overshoot the underarm and bikini-line ceiling of 5–7% by a wide margin, which is the practical reason body-area guidance exists as its own section rather than being inferred from a product's category alone.

The Disclosure Gap: Percentage Is Public, pH Is Not

Concentration disclosure is now near-universal — 44 of the 48 products we track (92%) state their percentage, because a number on the label sells. But the percentage only tells you half the story: the formula's pH determines how much of that acid is in its active, skin-penetrating "free acid" form.

And pH is where disclosure collapses — but the deeper problem isn't that pH disclosure is rare, it's that even when a brand does disclose it, a published range doesn't tell you the strength. We audited the brand's own website for each of the 31 glycolic products sold on Amazon US that we track (audited 5 September 2026): of the 26 whose product page could be read, 8 publish a numeric pH — 31%. Thirteen brands raise pH at all, and 5 of those give no number — L'Oreal Paris calls its formula's pH "proprietary," while Botanic Tree, Era Organics, Medix 5.5, and Replenix use language like "pH-balanced" or "pH optimized" with no figure attached.

Of the 8 that do publish a number, 6 give a range rather than a single value: The Ordinary (pH 3.5–3.9), The INKEY List (3.6–4.0), DCL Skincare (3.7, stated tolerance 3.5–3.9), Naturium (3.50–4.00), Minimalist (3.4–4.0), and Perfect Image (1.7–2.0). Only Alpha Skin Care (4.0) and TOUCH (3.5) publish a single value. Glytone is a separate case: it publishes a free acid value directly rather than a pH (its exfoliating body wash is 8.8% free acid, its body lotion 17.5%) — a real disclosed quantity, distinct from the brands above that disclose nothing.

Here's why the range matters more than whether a number exists at all. Applying this site's own free-acid model (Henderson–Hasselbalch, pKa 3.83) to each brand's own stated concentration across its own stated pH range:

Brand Stated Free acid across the range Spread
Minimalist8%, pH 3.4–4.03.23% – 5.83%1.81×
Naturium10%, pH 3.50–4.004.03% – 6.81%1.69×
The INKEY List10%, pH 3.6–4.04.03% – 6.29%1.56×
The Ordinary7%, pH 3.5–3.93.22% – 4.77%1.48×
DCL Skincare20%, pH 3.5–3.99.20% – 13.63%1.48×
Perfect Image30%, pH 1.7–2.029.56% – 29.78%1.01×

A shopper reading "pH 3.4–4.0" on the Minimalist label has been told the product could deliver anywhere from 3.23% to 5.83% free acid from a single labeled percentage — a 1.81× spread. This isn't an accusation of bad faith: manufacturing tolerance is real, and DCL states its own tolerance range on the label. The point is narrower: the disclosure, as given, does not determine the strength. Perfect Image's 1.01× spread is the model behaving correctly at an extreme, not Perfect Image disclosing better than the rest — its pH sits so far below the 3.83 pKa that nearly all the acid is already in free-acid form regardless of where in the range it falls. Try any of these ranges yourself in the free acid calculator.

Chemical Identity

Property Value
IUPAC / common name 2-hydroxyacetic acid (glycolic acid, hydroxyacetic acid)
CAS number 79-14-1
Molecular weight 76.05 g/mol — the smallest alpha hydroxy acid
pKa 3.83
Closest AHA by size Lactic acid, 90.08 g/mol (~18% larger)
Natural source Sugarcane (commercial production is synthetic)
Healthy skin surface pH (for context) ~4.5–5.5; glycolic formulas typically work at pH 3.0–4.0

Source for the chemical constants above: PubChem, the NIH's open chemistry database. The molecular size point is the practical one: at 76 g/mol, glycolic acid penetrates the stratum corneum faster and deeper than any other AHA at equal concentration — which is why a 7% glycolic product can out-exfoliate a 10% lactic acid product, and why glycolic is also the most irritating AHA per percentage point.

Regulatory & Clinical Numbers

Authority / study Figure What it means
CIR Expert Panel (US) ≤10% at pH ≥3.5 Safety ceiling for consumer glycolic acid products
EU SCCS ≤4% at pH ≥3.8 Stricter EU position for consumer leave-on products
US FDA Sun-sensitivity guidance AHA use measurably increases UV sensitivity; daily SPF advised. Cosmetics are not pre-market "approved" in the US
Randomized controlled trial (80 patients, 2019) 5% ≈ 20% A well-formulated 5% glycolic complex performed comparably to 20% glycolic acid for mild-to-moderate acne
Professional peel range 20–70% In-clinic only: timed application, monitored frosting, immediate neutralization. 2–4 week intervals
Keratosis pilaris prevalence ~40% of adults One of the most common concerns glycolic acid treats; see our KP guide
Skin surface renewal cycle ~28 days Why visible results take 3–8 weeks — see the before & after timeline

Set against those regulatory ceilings, the database's own 30% median at-home-peel concentration and 70% disclosed maximum sit well above the CIR's 10% consumer guidance — a reminder that "sold to consumers" and "within the regulator's suggested range" are two different claims, and the gap is exactly where routine and patch-testing guidance earns its keep.

Important: Statistics describe products, not advice for your skin. Concentration tolerance is individual — start low, patch test, and use daily SPF with any glycolic acid product. Concentrations above 20% carry chemical-burn risk outside professional supervision.

Marketplace Snapshot

Across the products in our database with verified Amazon rating data (n=33 of 47, snapshot August 2026): 188,423 combined customer ratings, averaging 4.52 stars, with a median of 1,400 ratings per product. The single most-reviewed product is The Ordinary Glycolic Acid 7% Exfoliating Toner at 46,100+ ratings — the category's de-facto default, alone accounting for over a quarter of every rating in the dataset. High averages across the category say less about individual products than about the ingredient: glycolic acid at sensible concentrations reliably does what it claims.

What This Dataset Doesn't Cover

A citation is only as good as its scope, so it's worth being explicit about what the 47-product database is not. It is a curated sample of glycolic acid products available on Amazon US, verified by hand — not a census of the global glycolic acid market. Brands that sell exclusively through their own storefronts, in-store retail, or non-US marketplaces are not represented, which means the true market almost certainly contains formulations at concentrations and price points this dataset doesn't capture. The Ordinary, for instance, sells additional glycolic formats outside its Amazon-listed 7% toner that don't appear here because they weren't independently verified against an ASIN.

Price is deliberately excluded from every statistic on this page. Amazon pricing changes daily and sometimes hourly, so a "median price" computed today would already be stale by the time this page is cited elsewhere — publishing it as a fact would violate the same reproducibility standard the rest of this page holds to. Product availability (in stock, discontinued, Prime-eligible) is also a snapshot, not a guarantee; the 48 products are re-verified periodically, but a product that was active at last_verified may not be by the time you read this.

Two structural gaps are worth naming directly. First, pH data is almost entirely absent from manufacturer labeling and therefore from this dataset (see the Disclosure Gap section above) — every concentration number on this page should be read alongside that caveat, not as a standalone strength ranking. Second, this is a product database, not a clinical one: the regulatory and clinical figures in the table above come from CIR, the EU SCCS, the FDA, and a single published RCT, not from testing any of the 48 products directly. Treat the two categories — what's in the bottles, and what the literature says about the ingredient generally — as related but separately sourced.

Methodology

Product statistics are compiled from our own database of 48 glycolic acid products across 7 formats (cleansers, toners, serums, creams, body washes, peel pads, peels), spanning 31 brands. Every product's ingredient list was verified by hand before inclusion — marketing copy doesn't count. Concentration figures use the brand's disclosed value; blends are counted at their stated total AHA/glycolic figure; four products that don't disclose a usable percentage are excluded from concentration statistics (three list no value at all, one states "undisclosed" in place of a figure). Rating data is an Amazon snapshot and changes over time. Chemistry constants are sourced from PubChem; regulatory figures link to their primary sources above.

Every catalog-derived number on this page — the format table, the two charts, the brand and blend counts — is computed by a script (scripts/stats-claims.js) that reads only src/_data/products.json, and that script's output is checked against this page's built HTML before every deploy. If the catalog changes, the numbers above are recomputed, not hand-edited. Regulatory and clinical figures (CIR, EU SCCS, FDA, the acne RCT, KP prevalence, the skin renewal cycle) come from the cited external sources above, not from the product database, and are not machine-verified the same way — treat them as citations to check against their primary source if you're relying on them. Read more about how we research.

Citing This Page

Any figure on this page may be cited freely with attribution. Suggested format:

glycolicacidcleanser.com, "Glycolic Acid Statistics: 48 Products by the Numbers," updated August 2026, https://glycolicacidcleanser.com/glycolic-acid-statistics/

Catalog-derived figures (concentration ranges, medians, disclosure rates, brand and blend counts, rating totals) are original compilations and may shift slightly as the database grows; this page's "last reviewed" date above reflects the snapshot date.

License: reuse the charts and figures on this page

GAC's own compilation, presentation, and charts on this page — the format table, the two charts above, and the catalog-derived statistics — are licensed CC BY 4.0. Reuse, screenshot, or re-embed them on your own site or in your own writing, provided you credit glycolicacidcleanser.com and link back to this page. This license covers only GAC's own compilation and presentation — it does not extend to the underlying figures or third-party material this page cites (CIR, the EU SCCS, the FDA, PubChem, the cited clinical trial, or Amazon's rating data), which remain the property of their original sources.

Attribution line, ready to copy:

Chart/data from glycolicacidcleanser.com, "Glycolic Acid Statistics: 48 Products by the Numbers" (https://glycolicacidcleanser.com/glycolic-acid-statistics/), licensed under CC BY 4.0.

HTML version, ready to paste under a reused chart or screenshot:

<p>Chart/data from <a href="https://glycolicacidcleanser.com/glycolic-acid-statistics/">glycolicacidcleanser.com</a>, licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY 4.0</a>.</p>

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the strongest glycolic acid you can buy over the counter?

In our 48-product database, the strongest over-the-counter formats are 35% peel pads and 70% gel peels sold online. However, regulatory bodies draw the consumer line much lower: the CIR Expert Panel considers up to 10% (at pH 3.5+) appropriate for consumer products, and anything above 20% is professional-peel territory. Products at these higher concentrations — including some sold at 30% and above — are available direct to consumers but carry real chemical-burn risk without professional-style timing and neutralization.

What is the maximum percentage of glycolic acid in body care?

Among body-specific products we verified, the ceiling is around 15-17.5%: a 15% KP body wash and a 17.5% free-acid-value exfoliating body lotion. Most body washes sit at 2-8.8%, and body creams at 10-17.5%. Body skin tolerates more than facial skin, but underarms and bikini area are exceptions — they need 5-7% or lower.

What percentage of glycolic acid do most products contain?

Across the 44 products in our database that disclose concentration, the median is 10%, but it varies sharply by format: cleansers cluster around 4.1%, toners around 7%, serums around 10%, creams around 12%, peel pads around 20%, and at-home peels around 30%. The format you choose effectively chooses your concentration range.

What percentage of glycolic acid should I use on my body, armpits, scalp, or feet?

By body area: underarms and bikini line 5-7% (thin, sensitive skin), arms and legs 7-10%, elbows and knees 10%+, feet and heels 10-15% (thickest skin on the body). For the scalp there is no established standard — dedicated glycolic scalp products are rare, and most scalp exfoliants use salicylic acid instead; people who do use a glycolic toner on the scalp typically use 5-7% with caution. Full breakdown in our body and underarm guide.

Do brands have to disclose glycolic acid percentage or pH?

No regulation requires either on the label. In practice, 92% of the products we track (44 of 48) voluntarily disclose concentration because it's a selling point. pH is different: auditing the 31 brands' own websites (5 September 2026), only 8 of the 26 whose product page could be read publish a numeric pH — 31% — and 6 of those 8 publish a range rather than a single value, which our own free-acid model shows can still hide a 1.5-1.8x difference in real strength. Glytone is the exception that publishes a free acid value directly rather than a pH. For everything else, pH data comes from third-party testing or not at all. See the full audit.

Is glycolic acid FDA approved?

Glycolic acid is not 'FDA approved' the way drugs are — cosmetics don't go through pre-market approval in the US. The FDA has studied AHAs and issued guidance: it considers them safe in cosmetics at the concentrations consumers typically encounter, provided products carry sun-sensitivity warnings, because AHA use measurably increases UV sensitivity. The CIR Expert Panel's safety assessment (up to 10% at pH 3.5+ for consumer use) is the standard the industry follows.

What is the molecular weight and CAS number of glycolic acid?

Glycolic acid (hydroxyacetic acid) has a molecular weight of 76.05 g/mol, CAS number 79-14-1, and a pKa of 3.83. It is the smallest alpha hydroxy acid — lactic acid, the next smallest, is 90.08 g/mol. That small molecular size is why glycolic acid penetrates skin faster and deeper than other AHAs at the same concentration.